loading...

14 May 2020
Apollo 13 (1995)
Apollo 13 (1995)
Share this:

WHAT WE THINK:

OUR SCORE:

3 out of 5 starsSome suspense with a topping of maths? It can be done.

JUST A FEW WORDS (IN THE HEAT OF THE MOMENT):

Apollo 13 is a film that feeds on suspense.
With attention to detail, a fair amount of research into what happened, the film manages (through a really interesting editing) to recreate a good degree of tension amongst all the parts and to keep it for most of the film.

In fact, the actual setup of the accident takes up about 1/4th of the film. The rest revolves around the frantic researches on how to make the three astronauts, who are drifting more than 200 thousand miles away from Earth, survive and then land back on Earth. And so, the turning of what seems it’s going to be the NASA’s “Darkest Hour” to what Ed Harris confidently define as its “finest hour“.

Towards the end, the film uses some obvious triumphalist traits, partially justified by the enormous difficulty of the operation and the consequent success. If 2/3rd of the narrative spectrum (spacecraft, ground control) are managed flawlessly and with extreme sagacity, the narrative dynamics of the family weighs the film down a bit, derailing it on tracks that are too traditional of the American cinema.

In conclusion, based on a true story, the film does everything to remain coherent and faithful to those events, without however renouncing to a healthy dose of suspense created with the means of the narrative art. A precarious and difficult balance (although part of this tension is intrinsic to the event itself) which, however, remains on its feet and makes it an interesting film to watch, provided you like “drifts” in space and you can go beyond the not-so-subtle triumphalistic ending.

PROS:

  • Ed Harris’ acting.
  • Editing – it’s really hard to handle the suspense on three point of views, instead of the more common two sides.
  • The accurate research and the attention to the detail.
  • Thematically: the idea that success can be born off the back of failure.

CONS:

  • The film, perhaps even subtly, criticises the media attention that turns to this event only when the possibility of drama is in sight, but maybe, towards the end, falls into the trap of the epic tale of success and grandeur, making it almost a victim of the same media flaw that he tried to criticise in an hinted way.
  • Al already mentioned, the way they manage the family point of view.
  • A certain mimetic and even too methodical form of filmmaking.

What do you think of this film? Please leave a comment below and let us know!

To read more of these film “pills”, please visit our dedicated section.

Or, if youโ€™re after a more-in-depth look at some films and/or filmmaking techniques more than just a quick take on the films as we watch them, please have a look at our Film Analysis page.


GENERAL INFO:

Apollo 13 (1995) Adventure, Drama, History | 140min | 13 October 1995 (Italy) 7.6
Director: Ron HowardWriter: Jim Lovell, Jeffrey KlugerStars: Tom Hanks, Bill Paxton, Kevin BaconSummary: Based on the true story of the ill-fated 13th Apollo mission bound for the moon. Astronauts Lovell, Haise and Swigert were scheduled to fly Apollo 14, but are moved up to 13. It's 1970, and The US has already achieved their lunar landing goal, so there's little interest in this "routine" flight.. until that is, things go very wrong, and prospects of a safe return fade. Written by Rob Hartill

Photos


See all photos >>

Share this:
Posted in PillsTaggs:
Write a comment